Phish or Fake? Take our phishing quiz and test your Phish IQ.
Posted by Shane Keats on July 16, 2007 01:21 PM
Update:
Thanks to the hundreds of thousands of people who took our phishing quiz. We're now examining the results. Look for more interactive features from McAfee in the future!
Can you spot the phish?
How well can you spot phishing sites? Many of the readers of this blog are pretty savvy when it comes to security issues. So, we’ve created a deceptively easy but devilishly hard 10-question phishing quiz. Are you up to the challenge?
Our Phishing Quiz follows on the heels of our Spyware and Spam quizzes. More than 120,000 test results later, we can safely say that we have a lot of work left to do. The average score for the spyware quiz was 59%. For the spam quiz, 55%.
MailFrontier published the first phishing quiz back in 2004. Given the persistence and mutability of this plague, we thought it was time to revisit the issue. Whether it's rockphishing, or Flash phish or MySpace scams, phishing continues to evolve and ensnare both the ignorant – the people who don’t know better – and the arrogant – the people who should know better. And victims continue to lose real money. According to Gartner, per victim losses soared from $257 in 2004 to $1,244 in 2006. That’s nearly a 5-fold increase.
We encourage folks to share the quiz with friends and family. Use your expertise and the opportunity presented by the quiz to share some of our hard earned collective knowledge about phishing. Who knows? We might even save a few people from getting hooked.

Comments
Thanks for that nice quiz.
To be honest I was really shocked, when I got only 9/10 (amazon.com took me down).
Already sent link to all of my friends.
Posted by: Vova | July 22, 2007 05:21 PM
I have a neat suggestion. Why is it that SiteAdvisor doesn't have an option to automatically block javascript on RED pages. Do you guys have any plan to add such a feature. Kindly reply.
Posted by: Chris | July 24, 2007 04:34 AM
Next time include all the url addresses for verification and not just an image. I have other ways of verifying authenticity
Posted by: Skip Vedell | July 26, 2007 08:37 AM
I agree with the comment on looking at URL addresses. Just because the text shows a legitimate address does not mean the link is make to that location.
Posted by: G. Hurlbut | September 20, 2007 08:28 AM