Main

July 26, 2007

Mapping the Mal Web Report Forces Change

Posted by Shane Keats at 11:24 AM

Back in March, we published Mapping the Mal Web an in-depth look at country-level domains. Tokelau (.tk) was the riskiest overall, with 10.1% of all tested domains rated red or yellow. Turns out that the people in a position to do something about that score took notice.

Dot TK, the private company that administers the domain on behalf of Tokelau (a territory of New Zealand), says it will install a system to filter malicious content. According to the CEO of Dot TK, the McAfee report spurred the new process: “We saw a decline of approximately 10% of new registrations in the countries where this report hit the press.”

According to press reports, Tokelau earns a double digit percentage of its GDP from revenue generated by the .tk domain.

January 09, 2007

Search Engine Safety Ranked by Regional Google Engines

Posted by Shane Keats at 09:23 AM

A few weeks ago, we released an update of this spring’s ground-breaking study of the safety of search engines. Today, we released a look at the safety of 31 different regional Google search engines.

Key findings:

• The most dangerous searches are being conducted on Google’s Indian regional domain, google.co.in. 9% of results for India’s most popular search terms are rated red or yellow by McAfee SiteAdvisor. Among India’s most popular risky keywords are Indian actors Salman Khan and Aishwarya Rai.

• Relatively risky searches are also being conducted by searchers in Greece (7.4%), where popular search terms include the television series “Rebelde Way” and pop band “Erreway.”

• Searchers in Finland and Ireland are performing the safest searches: only 0.7% and 0.9% of results for the most popular searches on google.fi and google.ie are rated red or yellow.

Search Study in Translation

Today, we also released the addendum along with the original study in German, French, Spanish, Dutch, Portuguese, Japanese, and Chinese (both traditional and simple.) Here are links to each of the translations:

German Study
German Addendum
Spanish Study
Spanish Addendum
French Study
French Addendum
Dutch Study
Dutch Addendum
Japanese Study
Japanese Addendum
Portuguese Study
Portuguese Addendum
Chinese Simplified Study
Chinese Simplified Addendum
Chinese Traditional Study
Chinese Traditional Addendum

December 11, 2006

The Safety of Internet Search Engines - Revisited

Posted by Hannah Rosenbaum at 10:00 AM

Today we released The Safety of Internet Search Engines - Revisited, a follow up report to our study from May comparing the safety of leading search engines. Co-authored by Ben Edelman, this study uses McAfee SiteAdvisor’s safety ratings to evaluate the safety of search results for popular keywords at the top five U.S. search engines (Google, Yahoo!, MSN, AOL, Ask). We also compare organic and sponsored search results and assess the risks of searching for keywords in various categories.

Key Findings:

• All the major search engines return risky sites in their search results for popular keywords. On average across all keywords, 4.4% of search results link to risky Web sites.

• AOL returns the safest results with 3.6% of results rated red or yellow by McAfee SiteAdvisor. At 5.1%, Yahoo! returns the most results rated red or yellow.

• 8% of sponsored results are rated red or yellow – almost three times the 3.0% of organic results rated red and yellow. Notably, scam sites are found at a much greater frequency in sponsored results.

• Overall riskiness of search engines declined by 12%, while the percentage of red and yellow sites in sponsored ads decreased half that amount.

Results in Perspective

We are encouraged to find that the incidence of risky sites in search results has declined from 5.0% to 4.4%. But search engine users still face dangerous sites at an alarming frequency. US users conduct an estimated 6.1 billion searches per month. If we conservatively assume that each search yields one and only one click to one of the sites listed in the results, then even a 4.4% incidence of red/yellow sites would mean 268 million clicks to dangerous sites every month from search engines. And it only takes a single visit to a dangerous site for a user to face serious and lasting consequences. One nasty download can clutter a user's PC with intrusive spyware or pop-up-serving adware. One misused e-mail submission can threaten the privacy of personal information and lead to a never-ending influx of spam. And worst of all, simply browsing to an exploit site can lead to security breaches and uncontrollable changes to a user’s PC.

To Search or Not to Search

We’re not advising anyone to stop using search engines -- we use them ourselves every day, many times a day. Search engines offer a fast and easy way to navigate the Web. But our study shows that consumers cannot rely on search engines to keep them safe. And they certainly shouldn’t assume that search ads are safer than non-sponsored results.

Search engines have made some progress in improving the safety of their results, and we applaud those efforts. We hope this study spurs further improvements.

The full report: The Safety of Internet Search Engines - Revisited (December 2006)